Silva-Valencia

Silva-Valencia v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202524-1951California1,268 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARINTIA CRISTINA SILVA- Nos. 24-1951, 24-5896 VALENCIA, Agency No.

A204-851-455

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated petitions for review, Darintia Cristina Silva-Valencia, a

native and citizen of Mexico, challenges two determinations of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA). In the first, the BIA reversed the immigration judge’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (IJ) conclusion that Silva-Valencia had established that her removal would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.