Sharif
Sharif v. Swindling
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MUHSIN SHARIF,
No. 24-3153 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 6:22-cv-01522-MK v.
MEMORANDUM*
ALEC SWINDLING; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann Aiken, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 6, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant, Muhsin Sharif, appeals the district court’s grant of
summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee, Officer Alec Swindling. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review grants of summary judgment de
novo. See Donell v. Kowell, 533 F.3d 762, 769 (9th Cir. 2008). We may affirm on
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). any basis supported by the record, even if the district court did not rely on it. See