Sharif

Sharif v. Swindling

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202524-3153California807 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MUHSIN SHARIF,

No. 24-3153 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 6:22-cv-01522-MK v.

MEMORANDUM*

ALEC SWINDLING; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 6, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant, Muhsin Sharif, appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee, Officer Alec Swindling. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review grants of summary judgment de

novo. See Donell v. Kowell, 533 F.3d 762, 769 (9th Cir. 2008). We may affirm on

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). any basis supported by the record, even if the district court did not rely on it. See

Johnson…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.