Ramirez-Quezada

Ramirez-Quezada v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202523-2228California588 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE RAMIREZ-QUEZADA, No. 23-2228 Agency No. Petitioner, A059-539-907 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jorge Ramirez-Quezada, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an

appeal from an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying him deferral of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal pursuant to the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and we deny the petition for review.

“Where, as here, the BIA agrees…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.