Pineda-Ruano
Pineda-Ruano v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202523-4361California1,054 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LUIS FERNANDO PINEDA- No. 23-4361 RUANO; MALFI LOPEZ- Agency Nos.
HERNANDEZ; K. P.-L., A220-688-933
A220-490-957
Petitioners,
A220-490-958
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 6, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Luis Fernando Pineda-Ruano, his wife Malfi, and their minor child
(collectively, Petitioners) petition for review of a decision of the Board of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming, without an opinion, an immigration judge’s
(IJ) denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of…