Pineda-Ruano

Pineda-Ruano v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202523-4361California1,054 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS FERNANDO PINEDA- No. 23-4361 RUANO; MALFI LOPEZ- Agency Nos.

HERNANDEZ; K. P.-L., A220-688-933

A220-490-957

Petitioners,

A220-490-958

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Luis Fernando Pineda-Ruano, his wife Malfi, and their minor child

(collectively, Petitioners) petition for review of a decision of the Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming, without an opinion, an immigration judge’s

(IJ) denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.