Bondi

Pelayo Brambila v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202523-1924California324 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE GUADALUPE PELAYO No. 23-1924 BRAMBILA, Agency No.

A205-714-920

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 5, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, MILLER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Jose Guadalupe Pelayo Brambila, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the

Immigration Judge’s denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Petitioner sought relief on the

ground that he feared…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.