Melchor-Ramos
Melchor-Ramos v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202524-223California595 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROFINO MELCHOR-RAMOS; LISSETH No. 24-223 SOTO-CUYAMANI; SCARLETT Agency Nos.
MELCHOR-SOTO; GERARD A213-368-968
MELCHOR-SOTO, A220-940-390
A220-940-391
Petitioners,
A220-940-392
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 6, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Lead petitioner Rofino Melchor-Ramos, along with his wife and their
children, challenges the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirming the decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) denying Melchor-Ramos’s
application for…