Melchor-Ramos

Melchor-Ramos v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202524-223California595 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROFINO MELCHOR-RAMOS; LISSETH No. 24-223 SOTO-CUYAMANI; SCARLETT Agency Nos.

MELCHOR-SOTO; GERARD A213-368-968

MELCHOR-SOTO, A220-940-390

A220-940-391

Petitioners,

A220-940-392

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Lead petitioner Rofino Melchor-Ramos, along with his wife and their

children, challenges the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirming the decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) denying Melchor-Ramos’s

application for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.