Gonzales-Fuentes

Gonzales-Fuentes v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202524-1450California1,056 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BREYNER GONZALES- No. 24-1450 FUENTES; SUCELY Agency Nos.

CORONADO; BREYNER A240-181-955,

GONZALEZ; DYLAN GONZALEZ, A240-181-956,

A240-181-957, and Petitioners,

A240-181-958

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Breyner Gonzalez-Fuentes, his partner, Sucely Selena Hernandez-

Coronado, and their two children, Breyner Emanuel and Dylan Jesus—natives and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). citizens of Guatemala—petition for review of the Board of Immigration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.