Douglas
Douglas v. Hill
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK C. DOUGLAS, No. 23-4324 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 3:22-cv-00884-JLS-BGS v.
MEMORANDUM*
RICK HILL; ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 21, 2025 San Diego, California
Before: WALLACE, McKEOWN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Appellant Patrick C. Douglas appeals from the district court’s denial of his
petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253.
“We review the district court’s denial of habeas relief de novo.” Panah v.
Chappell, 935 F.3d 657, 663 (9th Cir. 2019). We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. Douglas claims he received ineffective assistance of counsel during
sentencing due to his counsel’s…