Douglas

Douglas v. Hill

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202523-4324California423 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK C. DOUGLAS, No. 23-4324 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 3:22-cv-00884-JLS-BGS v.

MEMORANDUM*

RICK HILL; ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 21, 2025 San Diego, California

Before: WALLACE, McKEOWN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Patrick C. Douglas appeals from the district court’s denial of his

petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

“We review the district court’s denial of habeas relief de novo.” Panah v.

Chappell, 935 F.3d 657, 663 (9th Cir. 2019). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. Douglas claims he received ineffective assistance of counsel during

sentencing due to his counsel’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.