Bolanos

Bolanos v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202523-2438California777 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELSA DEL CARMEN No. 23-2438 BOLANOS; OSCAR EDUARDO Agency Nos.

HERNANDEZ BOLANOS, A208-173-098

A208-713-099

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Elsa Del Carmen Bolanos and her minor son, Oscar Eduardo Hernandez

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bolanos 1 (collectively, “Petitioners”), natives and citizens of El Salvador, seek

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an

appeal from an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying their application…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.