Meikle

Meikle v. County of Orange CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 2025G061912California6,800 words

Opinion

Opinion

Delaney, J.

Filed 2/10/25 Meikle v. County of Orange CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

CAROLE MEIKLE, Individual and as Personal Representative, etc.,

G061912

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2018- v. 00973047)

COUNTY OF ORANGE, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Theodore R. Howard, Judge. Affirmed.

V. James DeSimone Law, V, James DeSimone and Ryann E.

Hall, and Bohm Law Group and Zane E. Hilton, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Lynberg & Watkins, Norman J. Watkins and S. Frank Harrell, for Defendant and Appellant. On May 6, 2017, the Orange County Coroner’s Office (Coroner’s Office) erroneously…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.