Paleveda

Paleveda v. Alameda County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20255:24-cv-08716California1,197 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NICHOLAS EWING PALEVEDA, Case No. 24-cv-08716-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE

v. TO AMEND

ALAMEDA COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 12, 14 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a detainee, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. DISCUSSION Standard of Review Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity, or from an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Further, it should be noted that pleadings submitted by pro se parties must be liberally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.