Costa

Costa v. Apple, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20253:23-cv-01353California10,628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 FRANCIS COSTA, Case No. 23-cv-01353-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER CERTIFYING CLASS AND

v. DENYING FLSA DECERTIFICATION

APPLE, INC., Dkt. Nos. 298, 309, 313, 326, 331, 337, 345, Defendant. 371

Named plaintiffs Francis Costa, Amanda Hoffman, and Olivia McIlravy-Ackert bring this putative class action against defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”), alleging that Apple violated California and New York overtime laws by omitting the value of vested restricted stock units (“RSUs”) from the regular rate when it calculated class members’ overtime pay. Apple admits that it maintains this common pay practice for all class members. Common questions of law and fact will drive the resolution of this case and predominate over individualized inquiries. If plaintiffs prevail, damages will be calculated using data in Apple’s possession, according to the standards set forth by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 201,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.