In re Sandisk SSDS Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 Case No. 23-cv-04152-RFL (LJC) In re SANDISK SSDs LITIGATION.
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY
LETTER BRIEF Re: Dkt. No. 119
12 The parties have filed a joint discovery letter regarding Plaintiffs’ request for Defendants 13 to produce documents from three additional custodians, beyond the five custodians the parties had 14 previously agreed Defendants would provide. ECF No. 119. Judge Lin referred the case to the 15 undersigned magistrate judge for all discovery purposes. ECF No. 120. 16 Plaintiffs first “requested that Defendants search these custodial files on January 13, 17 2025.” ECF No. 119 at 1. Plaintiffs characterize their request as a natural follow-on to the “initial 18 discovery phase,” which involved five custodians who worked as engineers or in sales and 19 marketing. Id. at 2. Plaintiffs assert that they “now seek to progress discovery to cover 20 Defendants’ conduct after Defendants gained awareness of the defects, which requires…