(PC) Jace v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL JACE, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00476-KES-CDB Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S

v. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON

WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED

KEN CLARK, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendants.

Plaintiff Michael Jace is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. I. INTRODUCTION The Court issued its First Screening Order on March 27, 2023. (Doc. 13.) It found Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim against any named Defendant. (Id. at 3-9.) Plaintiff was granted leave to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the screening order, or, alternatively, to file a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Id. at 9.) On May 4, 2023, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (Doc. 14.) // // II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The…