Floyd

Floyd v. Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20253:24-cv-01278California3,621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 24-cv-01278-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT

SABER FITNESS HEGENBERGER, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 64 Defendant.

11 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Michael Devin Floyd’s motion to file a fourth amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). ECF No. 64. Defendant Saber Fitness Hegenberger, LLC filed an Opposition (ECF No. 71) and Floyd filed a Reply (ECF No. 74). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the February 13, 2025 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the motion.1 II. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Floyd, who is African-American, opened an all-access gym membership at Saber’s Planet Fitness in Jacksonville, Florida in 2019. Third Am. Compl. (“TAC”) ¶¶ 9,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.