Castillo

Castillo v. GEICO Insurance Agency, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20255:24-cv-06550California2,058 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JOSE CASTILLO and DOLORES Case No. 24-cv-06550-BLF

CASTILLO,

9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GEICO’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC and HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY OF [Re: ECF 17]

THE MIDWEST,

13 Defendants.

15 This action arises from an insurance coverage dispute relating to a homeowner’s policy issued to Plaintiffs Jose and Dolores Castillo (“Plaintiffs”) for a home located in Salinas, California (“the property”). Plaintiffs claim that the insurer, Defendant Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest (“Homesite”), has breached the policy and acted in bad faith by failing to provide coverage for fire damage to the property. Plaintiffs also claim that Homesite and its agent, Defendant GEICO Insurance Agency, LLC (“GEICO”), made negligent misrepresentations when speaking to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.