Lampkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRISHKA LAMPKIN, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-1204-JAM-JDP Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs Trishka Lampkin and Robert Cortez’s first amended complaint alleges claims against defendants Superior Court of Sacramento County and Matthew Cortez for disclosing plaintiff Lampkin’s address to Cortez, her former partner and abuser. ECF No. 60. The court dismissed defendant Superior Court following a successful motion to dismiss. ECF No. 70. With defendant Matthew remaining as the sole defendant, plaintiffs now move for default judgment again him. ECF No. 77. I recommend that their motion be denied, the court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ harassment claim against Cortez, and that claim be dismissed without prejudice to refiling in state court. 25 26 27 1 Considering that plaintiff Robert Cortez and defendant Matthew Cortez have the same last…