Doe

Doe v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20252:21-cv-01438California3,384 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA DOE, et al. No. 2:21-cv-01438-DC-CKD Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR

v. APPROVAL OF THE COMPROMISE OF A

MINOR AND FOR GOOD FAITH

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al. SETTLEMENT DETERMINATION Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 102, 106) 16 This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Maria Doe, Clara Doe, and I.D.’s motion for approval of the compromise of a minor (Doc. No. 102) and Defendants Jagdeep Singh, the Estate of Sushma Giri, and V & N Associates, LLC’s motion for good faith settlement determination (Doc. No. 106). Both motions were taken under submission to be decided on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. Nos. 107, 111.) For the reasons explained below the court will grant both motions. BACKGROUND In the operative second amended complaint, Plaintiffs allege the following. On May 7, 2018, Defendant Jagdeep Singh and his spouse, Sushma Giri, took title of 5973…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.