(PS) Love v. Tri-Counties Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20252:22-cv-01761California4,293 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY LOVE, No. 2:22-cv-01761-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TRI-COUNTIES BANK, Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Mary Love paid the filing fee and filed this civil action on October 6, 2022. Plaintiff initially had counsel, but counsel withdrew on September 8, 2023. (ECF No. 21.) Plaintiff proceeds in this matter pro se. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). Presently before the Court is defendant Tri-Counties Bank’s motion for attorney’s fees. (ECF No. 43.) The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument because plaintiff failed to file an opposition under Local Rule 230(c); the Court ordered plaintiff to file an opposition within fourteen days. (ECF No. 48.) Plaintiff filed her opposition on July 2, 2024. (ECF No. 51.) Defendant filed its reply on July 12, 2024. (ECF No. 52.) For the reasons set forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.