(PS) Bisi v. Chase Auto J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20252:23-cv-02508California287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY J. BISI, et al., No. 2:23-cv-02508-TLN-CSK Plaintiffs, v. ORDER CHASE AUTO J.P. MORGAN CHASE

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Gregory J. Bisi (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On December 27, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 29.) No objections were filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.