Sarfraz-Sattar

Sarfraz-Sattar v. PG&E Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20252:24-cv-00639California4,743 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHEHRAZ MOHAMMAD SARFRAZ- No. 2:24-cv-00639-TLN-SCR SATTAR, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER v. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, a California company; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Shehraz Mohammad Sarfraz-Sattar’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 22.) Also before the Court are Defendant Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15) and Motion to Consolidate Cases. (ECF No. 28.) All motions are fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 20, 23, 24, 26, 29, 31.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand and DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Consolidate Cases as moot. /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This action arises out of Defendant’s alleged wage and hour violations. (ECF No. 1-1 at 7–20.) From…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.