Andre Price v. Charles Schuyler
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202523-55324California470 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 11 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDRE LASHAUN PRICE, No. 23-55324
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-09446-RGK-JPR v.
CARLOS ARCE, Acting Warden, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 4, 2025 Pasadena, California
Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Andre Lashaun Price appeals the district court’s dismissal of his habeas
petition as impermissibly “second or successive” under the Antiterrorism and
Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). We
review de novo the dismissal of a habeas petition as “second or successive” under
AEDPA. Brown v. Atchley, 76 F.4th 862, 872 (9th Cir. 2023). We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we…