Mahan

United States v. Mahan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202524-1082California477 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1082 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:19-cr-00233-DCN-2 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROBERT BENJAMIN MAHAN II,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 7, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: BEA, KOH, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Robert Benjamin Mahan II appeals from the district court’s order

denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review a denial of a motion

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for compassionate release for abuse of discretion. United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d

797, 799 (9th Cir. 2021) (per curiam). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.