Poliakov

Poliakov v. King

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202524-619California1,496 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OLEG V. POLIAKOV, No. 24-619 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00428-MLP v.

MEMORANDUM*

MICHELLE KING, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Michelle L. Peterson, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 7, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: BEA, KOH, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Oleg V. Poliakov appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Social

Security Commissioner’s denial of his applications for supplemental security

income benefits and disability insurance benefits under Titles XVI and II,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). respectively, of the Social Security Act. The administrative law judge (“ALJ”)

found that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.