Bondi

Meza Paredes v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202522-574California353 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NEYDA TERESA MEZA PAREDES, No. 22-574 Agency No. Petitioner, A094-927-262 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, MILLER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Neyda Teresa Meza Paredes, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of her appeal from

the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for withholding of

removal. She claimed fear of persecution by her former father-in-law because he

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). threatened her when she tried to retrieve her children from him. Substantial

evidence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.