Manukyan

Manukyan v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202523-1766California364 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMEN MANUKYAN; GOHAR No. 23-1766 MELIKSETYAN; SARA Agency Nos.

MANUKYAN; LILIA MANUKYAN, A216-986-709

A216-986-708

Petitioners,

A216-986-710

A216-986-711

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, MILLER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Lead Petitioner, Armen Manukyan (“Manukyan”), his wife and two

daughters, are natives and citizens of Armenia. They petition for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals decision dismissing their appeal of the Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Judge’s denial of asylum, withholding of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.