Manukyan
Manukyan v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202523-1766California364 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 11 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARMEN MANUKYAN; GOHAR No. 23-1766 MELIKSETYAN; SARA Agency Nos.
MANUKYAN; LILIA MANUKYAN, A216-986-709
A216-986-708
Petitioners,
A216-986-710
A216-986-711
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 6, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: SCHROEDER, MILLER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Lead Petitioner, Armen Manukyan (“Manukyan”), his wife and two
daughters, are natives and citizens of Armenia. They petition for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals decision dismissing their appeal of the Immigration
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Judge’s denial of asylum, withholding of…