Watson

Watson v. Diet Madison Avenue CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 2025B332352California6,529 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richardson, J.

Filed 2/11/25 Watson v. Diet Madison Avenue CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

RALPH M. WATSON, B332352

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC707278) v.

DIET MADISON AVENUE et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Monica Bachner, Judge. Affirmed. Michael W. Ayotte for Plaintiff and Appellant. Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, Matthew G. Kleiner, Andrea K. Williams and Hannah Brown Goehring for Defendants and Respondents. _____________________________ Ralph Watson filed an action for defamation against anonymous actors he contends are responsible for posting defamatory statements on social media accounts, leading…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.