Vicky Bailey v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20252:23-cv-02684California853 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICKY B., Case No. 2:23-cv-02684-MEMF (JDE)

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends that the agency’s decision denying Plaintiff’s application for disability benefits be affirmed. (ECF No. 16.) Specifically, the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Plaintiff had not proven she had a medically determinable impairment of Graves’ Disease or hyperthyroidism during the period of alleged disability, from March 23, 1991, through September 30, 1996. (Id. at 8-10.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.