Laurence J. Graham v. DuPont De Nemours, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURENCE J. GRAHAM, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-09444-FLA (SKx)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
v. DISMISS COMPLAINT,
DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THE ACTION DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC., et al., SHOULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED, 15 Defendants. AND DENYING MOTIONS TO REMAND [DKTS. 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, 24, 25, 28, 58, 92, 96, 115, 132, 170, 267, 17 274, 283, 287, 292, 295]
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Before the court are several motions to dismiss the Complaint by the defendants in this action1 (collectively, the “Motions”). Dkts. 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, 24, 25, 28, 58, 92, 96, 115, 132, 170, 267, 283, 292. Plaintiffs in pro se Laurence J. Graham and Betty Patrick Graham (together, “Plaintiffs”) oppose the Motions. Dkts. 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 272, 286, 298. The court, to the extent it…