Burt
Burt v. Ramos
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMEL BURT, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00662-CAB-VET
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
v. ORAL MOTION TO QUASH
NICOLAI RAMOS, in his individual capacity, and COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, [Doc. No. 25] 15 Defendants.
17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Oral Motion to Quash Defendant County of San Diego’s (“County”) subpoena served on U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (“CBP”). Doc. No. 25 (“Motion to Quash”). On January 10, 2025, the County served a subpoena on CBP seeking any records that include, but are not limited to, body-worn camera footage, incident reports, and phone calls relating to Plaintiff and dated December 18, 2017 to present (the “Subpoena”). On February 10, 2025, the parties jointly contacted the Court and raised a discovery dispute concerning the Subpoena. Plaintiff objects and requests that the Court quash the Subpoena, arguing the records sought are not relevant and the Subpoena is overbroad. The County 27 …