Doe
Doe v. County of Santa Clara
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04948-JSW
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
DISMISS THIRD AMENDED
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, COMPLAINT Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 75
12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) filed by Defendant County of Santa Clara (“County”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers and relevant legal authority, and it finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS, IN PART, AND DENIES, IN PART, the motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History. Plaintiffs originally filed suit against their adoptive parents Marissa Clark and Brian Hernandez, their social worker Sharon Jenkins, and various departments of Santa Clara County. (See Dkt. No. 1, Complaint.) The…