Klomp

Klomp v. Frost

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20251:24-cv-01507California3,649 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

21 Plaintiffs Dennis A. Klomp, Daryl Klomp, and Natalie Klomp-Woods (“Plaintiffs”) filed a 22 civil suit against David B. Frost and Does 1–50 (“Defendants”) on October 16, 2024, in Fresno 23 County Superior Court. (Doc. 1-1 (“Compl.”).) On December 11, 2024, Defendants filed a Notice 24 of Removal to this Court based on federal question jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1331. (Doc. 1 at 2.) 25 Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Remand on January 9, 2025, (Doc. 4), and an amended Motion 26 to Remand on January 14, 2025, (Doc 9). Defendants filed an Opposition on January 28, 2024. 27 (Doc. 14.) Plaintiffs then filed a reply on February 4, 2025. 28 The Court has reviewed the Motion, Amended Motion, Opposition, Reply and supporting documents, and determined that this matter is suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Rule 230(g). For the reasons set forth below, this action is REMANDED to Fresno County Superior Court.1 II. BACKGROUND On June 16, 2023, Neva Marlene Klomp died in a fatal recreational boating accident on Pine 7 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.