Biden

(PC) Heizelman v. Biden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20251:25-cv-00153California1,701 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ROBERT HEIZELMAN, Case No.: 1:25-cv-00153-SKO Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

v. FORMA PAUPERIS

JOE BIDEN, et al., (Doc. 2)

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

Plaintiff Robert Heizelman is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983.Plaintiff initiated this action by filing his complaint on February 6, 2025. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). (Doc. 2.) I. THREE STRIKES PROVISION OF 28 U.S.C. § 1915 28 U.S.C. section 1915 governs IFP proceedings. The statute provides that “[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.