The Estate of Trevor Loflin v. City of Huntington Beach

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20258:24-cv-01075California4,469 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE ESTATE OF TREVOR LOFLIN, ) Case No. 8:24-cv-01075-JVS-JDE ) by and through its successor in interest, ) Paul Loflin, Jr.; and PAUL LOFLIN, JR., ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, and ) ) DOES 1-25, ) ) ) Defendants. ) 18 Based on the parties’ stipulation (Dkt. 27), and for good cause shown, the 19 Court finds and orders as follows. 20 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 22 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 23 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be 24 warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 25 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 26 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 27 discovery…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.