Flying Heliball, LLC v. Zero Zero Robotics Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20258:24-cv-01838California2,214 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 8:24-cv-01838-FWS-JDE

FLYING HELIBALL, LLC, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION FOR SERVICE OF

SUMMONS BY EMAIL WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE [52]

15 ZERO ZERO ROBOTICS, INC., et al. 16 Defendants.

28 Before the court is Plaintiff Flying Heliball, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Service of Summons by Email (“Motion” or “Mot.”). (Dkt. 52.) Defendant Zero Zero 2 Robotics, Inc. does not oppose the Motion. (Dkt. 58.) The court found this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. (Dkt. 63.) Based on the state of the record, as applied to the applicable law, the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action on August 21, 2024, alleging a single claim of patent infringement against Defendant Zero Zero Robotics, Inc. (See generally Dkt. 1.) On December 6, 2024, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint asserting the same claim and adding four…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.