Flying Heliball, LLC v. Zero Zero Robotics Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 Case No.: 8:24-cv-01838-FWS-JDE
FLYING HELIBALL, LLC, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION FOR SERVICE OF
SUMMONS BY EMAIL WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE [52]
15 ZERO ZERO ROBOTICS, INC., et al. 16 Defendants.
28 Before the court is Plaintiff Flying Heliball, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Service of Summons by Email (“Motion” or “Mot.”). (Dkt. 52.) Defendant Zero Zero 2 Robotics, Inc. does not oppose the Motion. (Dkt. 58.) The court found this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. (Dkt. 63.) Based on the state of the record, as applied to the applicable law, the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action on August 21, 2024, alleging a single claim of patent infringement against Defendant Zero Zero Robotics, Inc. (See generally Dkt. 1.) On December 6, 2024, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint asserting the same claim and adding four…