McKesson Corp. v. TIN Rx The Independent Network, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20252:24-cv-01225California6,411 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MCKESSON CORPORATION, Case No. 2:24-cv-01225-DJC-CSK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND REQUIRING

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF RE:

TIN RX THE INDEPENDENT PREJUDGMENT INTEREST NETWORK, INC., et al., (ECF No. 9) Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff McKesson Corporation’s motion for default judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) as to eight of Plaintiff’s thirteen claims. (ECF No. 9.)1 This motion was set for hearing for August 20, 2024. (Id.) Defendants TIN Rx The Independent Network, Inc., TIN Rx/Castro, San Francisco and TIN Rx At the Tower, Inc. did not file a response to the motion, nor have they appeared in this case in any way. On July 31, 2024, Plaintiff’s motion was taken under submission without argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) and (g). (ECF No. 10.) For the reasons stated below, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.