Botmi

(PC) Diaz v. Botmi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20252:24-cv-01417California455 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESUS DIAZ, No. 2:24-cv-1417 DAD AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS K. BOTMI, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 25, 2024, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 24. On January 3, 2025, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion within twenty-one days. ECF No. 25. In the same order, plaintiff was informed that failure to file an opposition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Id. The twenty-one-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a response to the motion for summary judgment or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In recommending this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.