Moreno

United States v. Moreno

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202523-448California702 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-448 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:22-cr-01375-BAS-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MOISES MORENO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cynthia A. Bashant, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 3, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Moises Moreno appeals his conviction and sentence for knowingly and

intentionally importing more than 400 grams of fentanyl in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and we affirm.

1. Ninety minutes into jury deliberations, the foreperson sent this note:

“Judge - We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.