Jogindra Singh v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202520-72846California953 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOGINDRA SINGH, 20-72846

Agency No. Petitioner, A209-945-995 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 4, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before COLLINS, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jogindra Singh (“Singh”) seeks review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the denial of his untimely motion to reopen

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and we deny

in part and dismiss in part the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The court reviews the denial of a motion to reopen for an abuse of discretion.

Ghahremani v. Gonzales, 498 F.3d 993, 997 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.