UPS

Gary Martirosyan v. UPS

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202523-55814California961 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GARY KAREN MARTIROSYAN, No. 23-55814

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-01094-SB-DFM v.

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a MEMORANDUM* corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 21, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, CHRISTEN, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Gary Karen Martirosyan appeals the district court’s order granting summary

judgment to UPS on his claims that UPS: (1) failed to provide a reasonable

accommodation for his disability and participate in an interactive process pursuant

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Cal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.