Bondi

Velasquez Portillo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202523-2160California590 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS ALONSO VELASQUEZ No. 23-2160 PORTILLO, Agency No.

A205-024-543

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS, VANDYKE, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Alonso Velasquez Portillo (“Velasquez”), a native and citizen of El

Salvador, petitions for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from a final removal order from an Immigration Judge

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“IJ”), which denied his application for adjustment of status pursuant to 8 U.S.C.

§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.