Tinsley

Tinsley v. King

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202524-1913California1,005 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DOUGLAS E. TINSLEY, No. 24-1913

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00557-SKV

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MICHELLE KING, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington S. Kate Vaughan, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 10, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. A. FLETCHER and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

Appellant Douglas E. Tinsley appeals a district court order that remanded his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States Senior District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. claim for disability insurance benefits for further administrative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.