Tinsley
Tinsley v. King
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202524-1913California1,005 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DOUGLAS E. TINSLEY, No. 24-1913
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00557-SKV
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MICHELLE KING, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington S. Kate Vaughan, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 10, 2025** Seattle, Washington
Before: W. A. FLETCHER and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.
Appellant Douglas E. Tinsley appeals a district court order that remanded his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States Senior District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. claim for disability insurance benefits for further administrative…