Rodriguez-Garcia

Rodriguez-Garcia v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202523-2711California814 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JENSIN ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ- No. 23-2711 GARCIA; STEVEN JOEL RODRIGUEZ- Agency Nos.

GARCIA, A208-743-747

A208-743-748

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, IKUTA, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Jensin Alejandro Rodriguez Garcia and Steven Joel Rodriguez Garcia,

brothers and natives and citizens of Honduras, petition for review of a decision by

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from an order of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.