Bondi

Penaloza Alcantar v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202523-3652California441 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 12 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IGNACIO PENALOZA ALCANTAR; No. 23-3652

MARIA GUADALUPE ORTUNO

RAMOS, Agency Nos.

A075-748-001

Petitioners, A075-748-002

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, IKUTA, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Ignacio Penaloza-Alcantar and Maria Guadalupe Ortuno Ramos, natives and

citizens of Mexico, petition for review of an order from the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appeals (BIA). The BIA dismissed petitioners’ second motion to reopen

proceedings sua sponte. We deny the petition for review for lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.