Bondi
Penaloza Alcantar v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202523-3652California441 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
FEB 12 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IGNACIO PENALOZA ALCANTAR; No. 23-3652
MARIA GUADALUPE ORTUNO
RAMOS, Agency Nos.
A075-748-001
Petitioners, A075-748-002
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 11, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: PAEZ, IKUTA, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Ignacio Penaloza-Alcantar and Maria Guadalupe Ortuno Ramos, natives and
citizens of Mexico, petition for review of an order from the Board of Immigration
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appeals (BIA). The BIA dismissed petitioners’ second motion to reopen
proceedings sua sponte. We deny the petition for review for lack of…