Anh Thai v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202523-55326California803 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 12 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANH TUYET THAI; et al., Nos. 23-55326 23-55327 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. and 3:15-cv-00583-WQH-NLS

MOHAMMAD NASSIRI; et al.,

MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

STATE AND/OR LOCAL AGENTS

LADA; DOES, 1-10,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Argued and Submitted September 10, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and HSU,** District Judge.

Anh Thai and Don Doan (referred to here as “plaintiffs”) challenge the

district court’s grant of summary judgment on multiple federal and state claims.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants

on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.