Robles

(PC) Hicks v. Robles

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20251:18-cv-01481California3,099 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL JAMES HICKS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01481-KES-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v.

SECOND MOTION TO WITHDRAW

H. ROBLES, et al., FROM HIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

BE DENIED

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 139, 146, 155)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michael James Hicks is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this closed civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion to withdraw from his settlement agreement, which the parties signed on October 15, 2020. Plaintiff argues that he should be entitled to withdraw from that settlement agreement because he claims that CDCR failed to properly pay debts from his settlement award. (ECF Nos. 139, 146, 155). Defendants Sotelo, Lucas, Robles, Martinez, and Voong oppose the motion, 24 arguing that they have complied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.