Robles
(PC) Hicks v. Robles
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL JAMES HICKS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01481-KES-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
v.
SECOND MOTION TO WITHDRAW
H. ROBLES, et al., FROM HIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
BE DENIED
Defendants. (ECF Nos. 139, 146, 155)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michael James Hicks is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this closed civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion to withdraw from his settlement agreement, which the parties signed on October 15, 2020. Plaintiff argues that he should be entitled to withdraw from that settlement agreement because he claims that CDCR failed to properly pay debts from his settlement award. (ECF Nos. 139, 146, 155). Defendants Sotelo, Lucas, Robles, Martinez, and Voong oppose the motion, 24 arguing that they have complied…