Marinkovic

Marinkovic v. Lee

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20253:22-cv-00998California5,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 M. MARINKOVIC, Case No.: 22-CV-998-JO-JLB

Plaintiff,

AMENDED ORDER (1) GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S THIRD

ADRIANNE LEE, KENDYL

AMENDED COMPLAINT; (2)

MAGNUSON, STAR RIVERA-LACEY,

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

NORMA MIYAMOTO, ROBERTO

TO AMEND TO ADD OLD PARTIES

RODRIGUEZ, KARTIK RAJU, MARK

EVILSIZER, CHRISTIAN GARCIA, IN

THEIR PERSONAL AND INDIVIDUAL

CAPACITIES AND IN THEIR

OFFICIAL CAPACITIES JOINTLY

AND SEVERALLY, AND PALOMAR

COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, Defendants.

On April 26, 2024, pro se Plaintiff M. Marinkovic filed his Third Amended Complaint alleging he faced discrimination on account of his disability while he was a student at Palomar Community College District (“Palomar”). Dkt. (“TAC”). Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.