Doe

Doe v. Hey Favor, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20253:23-cv-00059California2,780 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00059-WHO (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE JANUARY 24, 2025

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTES

FULLSTORY, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 186, 187 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Jane Doe II1 and defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”)2 ask the Court to resolve several disputes regarding the scope of plaintiff’s document discovery of Meta. Dkt. Nos. 186, 187. The Court held a hearing on these disputes on February 4, 2025. Dkt. No. 189. The Court resolves these disputes as explained below. I. BACKGROUND In this action, plaintiff alleges that she is a former user of Hey Favor (“Favor”), a “combination telemedicine company and direct-to-consumer pharmacy.” Dkt. 133 ¶ 1. According to plaintiff, Favor installed Meta’s Pixels and software development kit (“SDK”) on its platform (i.e. its website and mobile application), which then permitted Meta to obtain her and others’ “health data and other highly sensitive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.