Mongia
Mongia v. City of Fresno
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ISAAC MONGIA, Case No. 1:23-cv-01234-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
v. DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S PENDING STATE
PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF FRESNO, et al.
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Isaac Mongia proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 3, 18). On January 14, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint, which is now before the Court on screening. (ECF No. 18). In his Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff asserts claims arising from his detention and 19 arrest for violating a restraining order in Fresno, California. However, it appears from state court 20 records that Plaintiff has a state criminal case arising out of the arrest at issue in his complaint. 21 Specifically, the Court takes judicial notice of The People of the State of California v. Isaac 22 Mongia, Case No. M22906541, Fresno County Superior…