Spriggs

Spriggs v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20253:24-cv-01006California4,292 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND SPRIGGS, Case No.: 24-CV-1006 W (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND

CITY OF SAN DIEGO; OFFICER

AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOC. 15]

CAMERON WATSON; and DOES 1 15 through 50, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s, City of San Diego (the “City”), Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s, Raymond Spriggs, Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). (Mtn. [Doc. 15].) The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons provided below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Motion to Dismiss. 24 I. BACKGROUND On January 9, 2022, Mr. Raymond Spriggs, a Black man over 50 years-old, alleges he was sitting in a car in a parking lot waiting for his cousin to return from the store. (SAC [Doc. 14] at 3, ¶ 8.) While waiting, Mr. Spriggs observed Officer Cameron Watson and other officers…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.